On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:16 PM, DANIEL JESUS COLOMA BAIGES <dcoloma@tid.es>wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I agree with your suggestion but I cannot commit for doing it. I'll > check next week if somebody else in my team could do it. > I'd prefer for those currently active in the group and expressing views on this mailing list to edit it. The discussions we've had on write backs run long and deep. I wouldn't want someone coming in to the group and immediately editing such a specification without first showing that they have understood the past discussions on the subject and have innovative ideas on how to progress the work. This request is not directly on you but if people have strong opinions then they must be willing to contribute to the editorial process also. That has to be how it works. - Rich > > Cheers > > >> If you feel like the Contacts Writer spec is the way forward, then >> perhaps, Suresh or Daniel, you are willing to take over the editing of this >> specification to document the programmatic write and save mechanism in a way >> that works. I'm happy to let the market ultimately decide what works. >> >> Does this sound like a good way to proceed on this? >> > > Hmm, no response so far. > > I don't see any progress happening on this specification without someone > contributing their time to editing it. As the current editor, I plan to drop > this in the coming days. > > > > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 13:35:34 UTC