- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:29:29 +0100
- To: <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>, <dcoloma@tid.es>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
yes, this was a typo. tx regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 18, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Anssi Kostiainen wrote: > > On 17.1.2011, at 18.52, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > >> Your proposal of referencing vCard 2.0 and adding a note re vCard 4 seems sensible. > > You must mean vCard 3.0, right? AFAIK there's no 2.0? > >> On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Anssi Kostiainen wrote: >> >>> Re backward compatibility, the section "10.1. MIME Type Registration" [1] says: >>> >>> [[ >>> >>> Interoperability considerations: The text/vcard media type is >>> intended to identify vCard data of any version. There are older >>> specifications of vCard [RFC2426][oldreference_VCARD] still in >>> common use. While these formats are similar, they are not >>> strictly compatible. In general, it is necessary to inspect the >>> value of the VERSION property (see Section 6.7.9) for identifying >>> the standard to which a given vCard object conforms. >>> >>> In addition, the following media types are known to have been used >>> to refer to vCard data. They should be considered deprecated in >>> favor of text/vcard. >>> >>> * text/directory >>> >>> * text/directory; profile=vcard >>> >>> * text/x-vcard >>> >>> ]] >>> >>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev > > We may also want add a note re the new catch-all MIME type "text/vcard". > > -Anssi
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 14:30:32 UTC