Re: Messaging API usage (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-12) from Christopher Hunt on 2011-01-12 (public-device-apis@w3.org from January 2011)

From: Christopher Hunt <huntc@internode.on.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:20:12 +1100
To: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>
Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-Id: <DC7D42A5-22F8-4A07-8CB0-3C4DC5586950@internode.on.net>

On 12/01/2011, at 11:21 PM, Rich Tibbett wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I could see value in unlinking the communication protocol from
> interfaces names, and instead use the URI schemes as the way to tie to a
> specific protocol; this would be more flexible and better integrated in
> the Web architecture.
> 
> That would be good.
You may wish to take inspiration from Apache Camel's URI scheme for messaging components on this then (1).

Kind regards,
Christopher

(1) http://camel.apache.org/components.html

Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 22:20:46 UTC