- From: Niklas Widell <niklas.widell@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:53:19 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com] ... > I don't know if it's all that cosmetic. If we use a type we > have to define the way in which the other parameters are > passed (e.g. to, cc, subject) whereas if we reuse a URI > scheme presumably it knows how to carry its own information. > Should the URI be required to carry all info needed? Then we only need a send_msg(URI, attachments_list) method. That would make things simple (or move the headache of creating a correctly encoded URL to the developer). Adding some callbacks will give success/error feedback. Best regards, Niklas
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 15:53:54 UTC