Draft minutes 2011-02-01

Hi all,

short call today, not many people showed up. The minutes are at:

  http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-dap-minutes.html

and the text version follows.

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

          Device APIs and Policy Working Group Teleconference

02 Feb 2011

   [2]Agenda

      [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Feb/0002.html

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-dap-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Dzung_Tran, Claes_Nilsson, Niklas_Widell,
          Dominique_Hazael-Massieux, Cecile_Marc, Anssi_Kostiainen,
          Jerome_Giraud, bryan_sullivan, Ingmar_Kliche

   Regrets
          Suresh_Chitturi, Frederick_Hirsch, Lazlo

   Chair
          Robin_Berjon

   Scribe
          Anssi

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Announcements, meeting planning, logistics
         2. [6]Minutes approval
         3. [7]Contacts
         4. [8]Adjourn
     * [9]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

   <trackbot> Date: 02 February 2011

   <darobin> fjh, thanks a lot!

   <darobin> dom, I need to rush out and back, I might be 90 seconds
   late

   <hta> I have no idea what number I show up as this time...

   <nwidell> Need to drop off irc for 20 mins or so, will remain on
   phone

   I can volunteer to be a scribe today

   <darobin> Scribe: Anssi

   <darobin> ScribeNick: AnssiK

Announcements, meeting planning, logistics

   <darobin>
   [10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-device-apis/2011Jan/0
   006.html

     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-device-apis/2011Jan/0006.html

   darobin: TPAC 2011 will be in Nov, 2011, five days meeting

   <darobin> proposed RESOLUTION: Schedule DAP F2F during TPAC 2011 for
   3-4 November 2011.

   darobin: DAP proposed to meet Thu+Fri on the TPAC week, ok?

   RESOLUTION: Schedule DAP F2F during TPAC 2011 for 3-4 November 2011

   <darobin>
   [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-device-apis/2011Feb/0
   000.html

     [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-device-apis/2011Feb/0000.html

   darobin: there's Zakim VoIP access, see the link for more info

   <darobin>
   [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Jan/0
   096.html

     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Jan/0096.html

   darobin: Messaging API draft was published last week
   ... let's discuss a bit about the Web Introducer, Claes, any news?

   <darobin> [13]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43696/seoul-f2f-reg/

     [13] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43696/seoul-f2f-reg/

   darobin: (unable to hear Claes)
   ... there's a reg. page for DAP F2F, time to register to help host
   work out the logistics

Minutes approval

   <darobin> proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 19 January 2011 approved

   RESOLUTION: Minutes from 19 January 2011 approved

Contacts

   <Zakim> dom, you wanted to mention rechartering

   do people want to discuss the APIs now or re-schedule for the next
   week (low participation)?

   dom: we've been working on a new charter
   ... I've sent a mail to the list to ask for feedback on that
   ... it's just a draft, and I expect us to spend some time on that
   during the F2F

   <darobin> [14]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/DeviceAPICharter.html

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2010/11/DeviceAPICharter.html

   <dom>
   [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Feb/0
   005.html

     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2011Feb/0005.html

   dom: all feedback welcome

   niklas: what was the main problem with the existing charter

   dom: too broad a scope was one thing
   ... in addition, policy framework and group's approach to privacy
   ... summary: all changes in the charter were based on specific
   feedback from implementors

   bryan: there are web runtime vendors who are implementing BONDI etc.
   policy* parts

   dom: there has been very little concrete contributions toward the
   group

   bryan: Q on whether policy aspects are baked in the new charter

   dom: participation from the implementors is the key, that's lacking
   re policy*

   darobin: feedback re re-chartering can be provided via all the usual
   channels
   ... any other issues?

   <dom> Regets +Lazlo

Adjourn

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 15:25:11 UTC