that's ridiculous; you might as well argue that the presence or absence of the battery API itself is a privacy violation, since it allows some fingerprinting On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 12/02/2011 12:59 AM, Carr, Wayne wrote: > >> It appears that changes in the Last Call draft have made it so there >> is no way to distinguish between a full battery and no battery being >> present. Was the ability to detect a battery being present >> intentionally removed? >> > > I hope so. > Being able to detect whether or not there is a battery > would be a privacy violation and would allow some > fingerprinting.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 23:24:51 UTC