- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:12:42 -0400
- To: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>
- cc: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Rich, --On September 10, 2010 3:00:59 PM +0200 Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com> wrote: > > As I noted before, the main disadvantage of using an RDATE list as > > opposed to an RRULE is that the "pattern" of the recurrence is lost. > > i.e. a list of dates does not obviously convey the meaning of "every > > Monday at 10 am". That makes it hard to adjust the event in the case > > where changes are needed. > > Right. Any further proposals from members of the group around RRULE would > be most appreciated. At this stage we have a proposal to support > non-Gregorian calendars only based on RDATE which should probably be > considered as an interim but workable solution. > The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium is having a face-to-face meeting early next month at the IBM campus in Littleton, MA, USA (<http://www.calconnect.org/calconnect19.shtml>). That would be a good place to have current iCalendar "experts" discuss any proposal (I will be there and would certainly like to report on our discussions here). -- Cyrus Daboo
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 16:13:19 UTC