- From: Rich Tibbett <rich.tibbett@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:36:59 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it>
- Cc: Rich Tibbett <richt@opera.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim-ZN93BWjOCyKrzPXcqYB30XVxQ5k0+WG8T_0W@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it> wrote: > > On 9 Sep 2010, at 18:45, Rich Tibbett wrote: > > > My current plan was to stick with the basic Portable Contacts set > included in the spec and then provide clear extension guidelines for > developers to provide the larger set of OpenSocial properties as required. > > Why are these Open Social properties so important in a users *address* book > ? > eg: heroes, pets, turnOffs, turnOns, scaredOf, happiestWhen, bodyType, > tvShows... > Do you really want to put those explicitly in the API? > They are not explicitly included in the current API. Shouldn't they (and everyone else's) be available via an extension > mechanism? > That is what I proposed above. They are not included in the current API with the exception of a note saying that they still need to be considered. The proposal is to do that as part of general extension guidelines. If we could fully define these extension properties before they get used then the cost is less than not specifying anything at all. > > Contacts API should aim for the core - based on the most widely used > *industry* *standard*. > It is my understanding that with the exception of 'connected', 'accounts' and the more detailed 'organisations' included in the current W3C spec we have a lossless mapping to the current vCard version 4.0 draft. Saying the W3C Contacts API maps to Portable Contacts at the expense of vCard is probably a misrepresentation of the actual content of the specification. That's with the exception of the note included in the spec regarding the under-speced OpenSocial attributes contained within Portable Contacts...that will be subsumed to an Extensions section of the spec anyway as per the current proposal. If I export from a Portable Contacts format to vCard and back to Portable Contacts I want whatever content was originally included to still be available, right? I have high hopes that the vCard Social Formats Extensions draft [1] will provide clear mappings for Portable Contacts properties to the vCard format to make the process of moving between these formats lossless and well-defined across both web services and devices. - Rich
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 12:44:38 UTC