- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:29:21 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi, On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 12:47 +0100, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:31 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> >> wrote: >> > As such, the chairs propose it be published as a Last Call Working Draft >> > and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so: >> > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/ >> >> I think the dependency with HTML5 should be sorted out before going to >> Last Call. > > Could you clarify what you mean by sorting out the dependency with > HTML5? Is your concern that the spec overrides something that HTML5 > defines (the accept attribute content model)? > >> I am personally also not sure that putting the capture hint in the MIME >> type is really the right way to go. It certainly complicates the >> processing model of <input accept> as UI hint quite a bit. (I.e. from >> simple string comparisons to full blown MIME type parsing, including >> figuring out what to do with unknown parameters, parse errors in >> parameters, etc.) > > I agree this complicates the processing of the attribute; Andrei, since > Android (from what I understand) implements this through the MIME type > attribute, do you have any feedback on the implementation cost of > parsing the attribute? How are you dealing with unknown/unparseable > parameters? > We just ignore them. The implementation cost of supporting this was very low. Thanks, Andrei > I've also raised ISSUE-105 as a result to your message; this presumably > hinders progress to Last Call for the time being. > > Dom > >
Received on Friday, 19 November 2010 15:29:57 UTC