- From: Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:43:21 -0800 (PST)
- To: Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
- Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org>
Jian Li is right. I'm fixing this in the editor's draft. ----- Original Message ----- > Good point; folks are going to want more precision than the day. > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Jian Li <jianli@chromium.org> wrote: > > I have a question regarding lastModifiedDate. The spec says that > > this > > property returns "an HTML5 valid date string". Per HTML 5 spec, a > > valid date > > string consists of only year, month and day information. It does not > > contain > > any time information. Do we really want this or what we want to > > return is "a > > local date and time string" per the HTML5 spec? > > Thanks, > > Jian > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> WebApps WG, > >> > >> There have been some updates to the File API. > >> > >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/ > >> > >> Notable changes are: > >> > >> 1. Exception codes are no longer harnessed to DOMException's > >> exception > >> codes, per discussion on this listserv. > >> > >> 2. Metadata attributes creationDate and lastModifiedDate have been > >> added > >> to the File object, per discussion on the WHATWG listserv. > >> > >> 3. Blob no longer has a .url attribute. Instead, Window and > >> WorkerGlobalScope have been extended with methods createBlobURL and > >> revokeBlobURL, per discussion on this listserv. > >> > >> 4. The Blob URI section has undergone changes, per discussion on > >> this > >> listserv. Notably, Blob supports the addition of an HTTP > >> Content-Type, > >> which implementations must return as a response header when Blob > >> URIs are > >> dereferenced. > >> > >> 5. There are (ongoing) fixes to bugs, including incorrect uses of > >> long > >> long (in lieu of unsigned long long), per (ongoing) discussion on > >> the > >> listserv. > >> > >> In off-list discussion, a few points have come up, which I'll > >> summarize > >> below: > >> > >> 1. The emerging "HTML5 Device" specification [1] includes a section > >> on > >> streams and an affiliated Stream API, which relies normatively on > >> Blob URIs > >> [2] defined in the File API. Since we've eliminated the .url > >> property on > >> Blob, we should also eliminate the .url property on the Stream > >> object. > >> There has been some discussion on renaming the methods > >> createBlobURL and > >> revokeBlobURL to be more generic, so that use cases such as Stream > >> can be > >> accommodated. This is an ongoing discussion. In general, there's > >> consensus > >> around eliminating the .url attribute from Stream. > >> > >> 2. There is ongoing discussion about the addition of > >> Content-Disposition > >> as well (as an attribute on Blob, as a parameter to Blob.slice, and > >> as a > >> response header when dereferencing blob: URIs), to facilitate and > >> optimize > >> downloads. The use of a Content-Disposition header allows URLs > >> (both > >> http:// and blob:) to dereference content straight for download, > >> with the > >> benefit of header-determined processing (e.g. the download doesn't > >> occur > >> first). Another suggestion to address this use case is that instead > >> of > >> supporting Content-Disposition, to allow for an additional URL > >> property on > >> the FileSaver constructor, modulo domain restrictions. This > >> discussion is > >> ongoing. > >> > >> 3. In general, there's ongoing discussion on allowing *even more* > >> HTTP > >> response behavior when dereferencing blob: URIs. I strongly favor a > >> strict > >> subset of HTTP, and only a use-case driven addition of further > >> response > >> headers and response codes. Arguments cited in favor of including > >> all of > >> http:// are that blob: URIs should be completely indistinguishable > >> from HTTP > >> URIs, thus allowing maximum reuse with XHR and other aspects of the > >> platform. Currently, I believe we allow for a great deal of > >> intermingling > >> without reproducing HTTP in its entirety within Blob URIs. > >> > >> -- A* > >> > >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-device/ > >> [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-device/#stream-api > >> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 07:44:01 UTC