- From: James Salsman <jsalsman@talknicer.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:49:46 -0700
- To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > Agenda — Device APIs and Policy Working Group — Distributed Meeting #33 2010-06-23 >... > 11) APIs - SysInfo > > Status > > 12) Capture... Under items 11 and 12, please add these questions from ACTION-191 to the agenda: 11.A. At http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#widl-AudioCodecAttributes-compFormat should "compFormat" be "compFormats"? Accordingly, in interface AudioCodecAttributes, should "attribute DOMString compFormat;" be "attribute DOMString[] compFormats;"? 11.B. Should compFormats be a comma- and/or space-separated list of MIME types instead of free form? 11.C. Should the examples for AudioCodecAttributes' compFormats be "audio/x-speex;quality=7;bitrate=16000, audio/ogg" instead of "'G.711', 'MP3', "MIDI'" (which includes encumbered types)? 11.D. In interface VideoCodecAttributes, should "attribute boolean hwAccel;" be "attribute boolean[] hwAccel;"? 11.E. Should the examples for VideoCodecAttributes' compFormats be "video/x-webm video/ogg" instead of "'H.264' or 'Theora'"? 11.F. At http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#idl-def-MicrophoneAttributes (interface MicrophoneAttributes) should "attribute DOMString name;" and "attribute DOMString types;" be included as the addressable microphone device name and MIME types available from it, respectively? 11.G. Similarly, at http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#idl-def-CameraAttributes (interface CameraAttributes) should "attribute DOMString name;" and "attribute DOMString types;" be included as the addressable camera device name and MIME types available from it, respectively? 11.H. Is "image/png video/x-webm ..." a good example set of camera types? 12.A. At http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/#widl-FormatData-type should "A valid MIME type for WAV sound file is audio/x-wav." be changed to "A valid MIME type for speech is audio/x-speex"? Thank you. I think these changes have been approved, but I understand I may have been too terse in ACTION-191. Sincerely, James Salsman
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 10:50:14 UTC