- From: Suresh Chitturi <schitturi@rim.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:08:32 -0500
- To: <Frederick.Hirsch@Nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, all, While reviewing the framework document, I encountered the following: 1) Lack of definitions for 'access request' and 'access query'. I assume they are the same? It might be good to describe it in a subsection under core concepts. 2) Would it make sense to describe all the steps illustrated in logical model under "4.2 Processing Rules" section? Right now, it is split into "Processing Rules" and "Feature and Capability Processing Rules" which is somewhat mis-leading. For e.g. are these done independently or is it reasonable to say that they may be both may be evaluated in one shot? 3) As stated earlier (in one of the conference calls), I think we need to understand the relation of this policy framework with the widgets specifications (i.e. configuration file that includes <feature> and WARP <access>). For example, how does the policy get evaluated in this case when both a policy file is present and "policy type" elements such as <feature> and <access> are declared in the widget package? Regards, Suresh -----Original Message----- From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@Nokia.com Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 9:43 AM To: public-device-apis@w3.org Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@Nokia.com Subject: updates to Policy Framework and Profile I have made a number of changes to the Poilcy Framework and Profile documents since last Thursday: 1. Edits to Framework based on Dom's editorial suggestions 2. Some additional restructuring of Framework document, added sections for concepts including trust, features and capabilities. Added material on trust from Nokia contribution. Consolidated attribute definitions 3. Profile - Moved attribute definitions from Framework to Profile 4. Profile - Incorporated examples from example document 5. Fixed numerous validation errors in Framework and Profile, both validate now. Fixed markup for RFC language to ReSpec convention, got rid of most <em> markup, using <code> where appropriate. 6. Fixed link checker issues in Framework/Profile, both ok now (though some same document links may be to wrong destination since there were duplicate ids defined.) 7. Removed Marcin from Policy editors list. Dom also fixed additional formatting issues, thanks Dom. I'll be looking at the content and organization more, but wanted to get some of the basics out of the way in the first pass. Please review the documents so we can plan to publish later this week. Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 21:09:07 UTC