W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Features draft - next steps

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:27:31 +0200
To: <robin@robineko.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016DB52D-129D-4174-BEAD-159F9C8E5264@nokia.com>
There is also the question of what the BONDI/WAC community will accept. It would be confusing to have multiple definitions, wouldn't it?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:10 PM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:

> On Aug 9, 2010, at 21:40 , <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Android has a list of permissions [1].  These are strings, not URIs, but we can compare the granularity and operations included.
> 
> Some people will be happier with strings anyway (e.g. I doubt that the checkPermission crowd will accept URIs). I think that we could get away with defining both, and leaving it up to people to figure out which to use for a given context.
> 
> --
> Robin Berjon
>  robineko  hired gun, higher standards
>  http://robineko.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2010 16:28:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:22 UTC