- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:34:26 -0400
- To: "public-device-apis@w3.org Device APIs and Policy Working Group WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
The Devices API charter lists the following milestone for 3Q09: "The Working Group reviews and compares existing starting points for the various deliverables, and establishes a detailed roadmap." I have created an issue related to determining our various security policy starting points: ISSUE-18 - Determine security policy starting points for review and comparison Clearly the list should include the contributions listed on the home page [1]: Nokia contributions BONDI contributions I understand that BONDI has been updated to 1.01 [2], including an update to the Security and Architecture document. What is necessary to formally submit the BONDI 1.01 specifications to the working group? (Once submitted we can update the DAP home page accordingly). We also have inputs from the Workshop, in particular the following: Nokia position paper by Steve Lewontin, http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/papers/SecurityPolicyNokia.pdf OMTP position paper, , http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/papers/OMTP_Security_Position_Paper.pdf Are there any other position papers or inputs that should be considered for evaluation and comparison? Are any updates to contributions plan, and if so, when? Do we have any volunteers to review and compare the inputs? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/#specs [2] http://bondi.omtp.org/1.01/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 16:35:33 UTC