W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > November 2009

RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities

From: DANIEL JESUS COLOMA BAIGES <dcoloma@tid.es>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:36:16 +0100
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-id: <4DC093FB1C4D6A4EA398DF8CA531137F1044487C60@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet>

 I shall try to create a first draft of the messaging API during the next couple of weeks.

Best Regards

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
> request@w3.org] En nombre de Dominique Hazael-Massieux
> Enviado el: martes, 10 de noviembre de 2009 11:29
> Para: public-device-apis
> Asunto: DAP Roadmap, priorities
> Hi,
> Per my ACTION-60, I have started working on a roadmap for our WG
> deliverables at:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/#roadmap

> I have listed at the top the APIs that were identified as our priorities
> in one of our early teleconfs [1], although we didn’t make it a formal
> resolution as far as I can tell. The APIs we agree to work on in
> priority [2] are:
> • Contacts
> • Calendar
> • Filesystems
> • Messaging
> Note that at this time, we only have active work on the Contacts API in
> that list, and some discussions around Filesystems — the lack of work on
> the two others is somewhat worrying. I think it would be useful to get
> people volunteering to come up with Editors drafts for Calendar and
> Messaging at the very least.
> I have heard several people thinking that the photo/audio/video capture
> API should also be a priority (myself included, actually), so maybe this
> is something we should reconsider.
> I would be also useful if the WG could approve the rough schedule
> (ideally after having agreed on more specifics for the priority APIs).
> I haven’t put any policy-related spec in the table, since I don’t think
> we have a very clear idea on how they are going to be articulated at
> this point; but when/if we do, we should definitely add them to the
> table.
> Ideally, we should discuss that roadmap each time we fall behind
> schedule on any of the priority items and update it after that
> discussion. I hope the Chairs can take responsibility for this, but I’ll
> try to watch this as well.
> I have also started listing API that we will not work on (per previous
> discussions), as well as APIs that have been suggested for future work
> (which matches Robin’s ACTION-56), although that latter list might be
> usefully moved to a wiki page as suggesting in the said action item.
> Dom
> 1.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2009Sep/att-

> 0050/Device_APIs_and_Policy_Working_Group_Teleconference_--
> _16_Sep_2009.htm#item07
> 2. this also takes of Robin’s ACTION-55; this might also take care of
> Frederick’s ACTION-57, although this is not in the wiki

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 00:37:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:13 UTC