Monday, 30 November 2009
- Re: [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- ACTION-68 - details please!
- Re: [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- Re: [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- Re: Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
- Re: Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
- Re: Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
- [contacts] Contacts API Update
- RE: [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- Re: [SysInfo] Wiki Page and a proposal for the API structure
- Re: ISSUE-47 (respec-opera): Opera doesn't render ReSpected issues [APIs — General]
- Re: ISSUE-46 (respec-opera): Opera doesn't render ReSpected issues [APIs — General]
- Re: ISSUE-45 (ReSpec-ToC-depth): Respec: customize table of content depth [APIs — General]
- RE: Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
- Re: [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- Re: [SysInfo] Wiki Page and a proposal for the API structure
- RE: Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
- [contacts] Comments on editors draft of Contacts API
- Schedule and criteria for FPWD of Contacts API
Friday, 27 November 2009
Thursday, 26 November 2009
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
- ISSUE-46 (respec-opera): Opera doesn't render ReSpected issues [APIs — General]
- Re: Camera/Caputre API (was: DAP Roadmap, priorities)
- ISSUE-45 (ReSpec-ToC-depth): Respec: customize table of content depth [APIs — General]
- Re: Camera/Caputre API (was: DAP Roadmap, priorities)
Sunday, 22 November 2009
Saturday, 21 November 2009
- Re: File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy)
- File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy)
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
Friday, 20 November 2009
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Camera API requirements
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Camera API requirements
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
Thursday, 19 November 2009
- Security evaluation of an example DAP policy
- RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- RE: Draft minutes 2009-11-18 teleconference
- RE: Draft minutes 2009-11-18 teleconference
- Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: APIs Design patterns
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- First brick in Policy Framework: Features and Capabilites?
- RE: APIs Design patterns
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: [Device APIs Requirements] Input to Applauncher API
- Re: APIs Design patterns
- Re: [Device APIs Requirements] Input to Gallery API
- Re: [Device APIs Requirements] Input to System Information & Events API
- APIs Design patterns
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Prague F2F 16-18/03 is confirmed
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- ACTION-55 Extract prioritary APIS and put on the group home page
- ACTION-26 Review MWABP
- ACTION-56 Create a wiki page for future work on APIs
- Draft minutes 2009-11-18 teleconference
- RE: Status of DAP Requirements
- Call cancelled next week (2009-11-25)
- RE: ACTION-52 Look at markup options for expressing implicit user consent
- Re: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2009-11-17
- Status of DAP Requirements
- Re: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: updated home page
- Re: ACTION-52 Look at markup options for expressing implicit user consent
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: updated home page
- Re: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: updated home page
- Re: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: Camera/Caputre API (was: DAP Roadmap, priorities)
- updated home page
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: ACTION-52 Look at markup options for expressing implicit user consent
- ACTION - 47 Provide input on trust model and access control model definitions
- Re: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: ACTION-52 Look at markup options for expressing implicit user consent
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?)
- RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?)
- RE: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?)
- Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?)
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
- Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
Tuesday, 17 November 2009
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2009-11-17
- ACTION-52 Look at markup options for expressing implicit user consent
- [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API
Friday, 13 November 2009
- Re: Camera/Capture API
- Re: Camera/Caputre API
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Work on Read before/separtely from Write? (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?)
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
Thursday, 12 November 2009
- Re: ISSUE-8: Requirements for [Camera/Caputre API]
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: Camera/Caputre API (was: DAP Roadmap, priorities)
- Re: ISSUE-8: Requirements for [Camera/Caputre API] (was: Updated requirements document)
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Camera/Caputre API (was: DAP Roadmap, priorities)
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Summary of Media Annotations WG 5th F2F in Santa Clara
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: ISSUE-44 (apiHanging): What do APIs hang off of? [APIs â General]
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?)
- Re: What does it all hang off of?
- ISSUE-44 (apiHanging): What do APIs hang off of? [APIs — General]
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
Wednesday, 11 November 2009
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- RE: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- RE: Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Contacts API: vCard vs. PoCo
- Updated Policy Requirements Editors Draft
- Re: Geolocation WG taking up work on Orientation/Acceleration
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- DAP Roadmap, priorities
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
Monday, 9 November 2009
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Geolocation WG taking up work on Orientation/Acceleration
- Re: Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Policy and browsers (was Re: Policy work items - request for proposals)
- Re: Geolocation WG taking up work on Orientation/Acceleration
- Geolocation WG taking up work on Orientation/Acceleration
Thursday, 5 November 2009
Wednesday, 4 November 2009
- Re: Policy work items - request for proposals
- Re: Policy work items - request for proposals
- Re: Policy work items - request for proposals
- Re: Policy work items - request for proposals
- revised minutes 2009-11-02 DAP F2F day 1
- Draft DAP minutes 2009-11-03, F2F day 2
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
- Re: Minor fix to DAP homepage
- draft minutes 2009-11-02 F2f Day1
- Re: ISSUE-7: Gathering requirements [Calendar API]
- Re: ISSUE-7: Gathering requirements [Calendar API]
- draft proposal for RFID/NFC API
- FYI: DAP related workshop in Korea
- Updated Nokia policy input
- Use Cases for Policy Interoperability
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Re: Policy work items - request for proposals
Monday, 2 November 2009
- RE: Policy work items - request for proposals
- Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely
- Policy work items - request for proposals
- OMTP BONDI 1.1 Candidate Release now available
- Re: Draft policy requirements
- Agenda v2, DAP 2-3 Nov 2009 F2f
- RE: [Device APIs Requirements] Input to Gallery API