- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:03:19 -0500
- To: ext David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
David, Since many of WebApps' members are not familiar with OMTP and BONDI, I have a some first order process-related questions regarding the proposed Release Candidate (RC). I'll withhold other comments e.g spec forking, fragmentation, etc. for now. * Where can we find the process that describes OMTP's comment and response process/protocol as well as the next step after RC? Does OMTP's process include a consensus commitment regarding the public's comments (as does the W3C's process [1])? * Where is the public archive for the comments? * Where is the exit criteria for this RC? Assuming this criteria requires two or more interoperable implementations (as is typically the case for W3C Candidate specs), where can we find the data that show there are interoperable implementations of the RC? * Based on a scan of [2], it appears this RC codifies the following version of WebApps' widgets specs: Packaging and Configuration - 12- Dec-2008; Digital Signatures - unspecified; APIs and Event - not included; Updates - the 07-Oct-2008 FPWD. Please confirm/clarify. * Regarding the following text in [2]: [[ BONDI has chosen to adopt the W3C Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration [7] specification. At the time of writing this specification has been published by the W3C Web Applications group (http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps) as a Working Draft at Last Call, and is judged to be stable enough to use as a basis for this BONDI specification. ]] Given the clear "Implementers should be aware that this document is not stable." warning in this LCWD [3], what criteria was used to determine this LCWD "is judged to be stable enough to use as a basis for this BONDI specification"? -Regards, Art Barstow, Chair of WebApps WG [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#Consensus> [2] <http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/ BONDI_Architecture_Security_Task_CR10.pdf> [3] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-20081222/> On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:46 AM, ext David Rogers wrote: > Dear all, > > As discussed in the Widgets F2F in Paris, please find the links to > the OMTP BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 documentation as follows. This > is open for public comment at the moment until the 9th of March > 2009 and can be downloaded from the BONDI site [1]: > > > 1) BONDI Architecture & Security [2] > > 2) BONDI Architecture & Security Appendices [3] > > 3) BONDI Interfaces [4] > > 4) BONDI Architecture & Security Lifecycle Events Use Cases [5] > > 5) All above files in a zip [6] > > Please also have a look at the BONDI APIs [7]. We would welcome any > feedback or change proposals and if you have any questions, please > feel free to email me. > > Thanks, > > > David. > > [1] http://bondi.omtp.org/ > [2] http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/ > BONDI_Architecture_Security_Task_CR10.pdf > [3] http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/ > BONDI_Architecture_Security_Task_Appendices_CR10.pdf > [4] http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/ > BONDI_Interfaces_Task_CR10.pdf > [5] http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/ > BONDI_Architecture_Security_Application_Lifecycle_Events_Use_Cases_CR1 > 0.pdf > [6] http://bondi.omtp.org/Documents/CR10/BONDI%201_0%20Candidate% > 20Release.zip > [7] http://bondi.omtp.org/apis/ > > > David Rogers > OMTP Director of External Relations > >
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 13:04:17 UTC