- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:11:06 +0200
- To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- CC: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > Hi Robin, > > As you say and having some experience with this selecting the format for writing the spec is very important and none of the existing formats are perfect. Particularly XMLSpec is evil :) > > The idea of using HTML 5 as an authoring format and use scripting for generating the final content is interesting, but what would happen if the user has disabled scripting in the browser? > As the W3C does not allow scripts in specs, I don't believe respec is intended to be seen by the actual consumers/readers of the specs. This is a tool that is used during the drafting/authoring process. Once drafting is done, then the generated markup is copied to a separate spec that is officially published.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 11:11:48 UTC