- From: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:05:03 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Hi Robin, in respec.js, line 149, you probably want: cfg.publishDate = new Date(val.substr(0, 4), val.substr(5, 2) - 1, val.substr(8, 2)); (because months start at 0) Max. [unless people insist that I don't, I'll report other bugs offline] On 6. aug.. 2009, at 01.49, Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi all, > > one of the annoying decisions one has to make when editing a > specification is which tool to use to generate the final, PubRules > compliant HTML. > > I don't intend to impose a solution on this — it is up to editors to > decide collectively — but I would like to suggest my favourite > option: ReSpec.js. > > Its chief advantage is that it does not require running any external > tool, one simply edits an HTML document according to some > conventions, reloads it in the browser, and voilà. It also has built- > in support for WebIDL, which'll come in handy for us. Unless you hit > a bug it should provide you with PubRules compliant HTML very easily > (the checker complains about a couple small things, but I would > think that they're wrong). > > I won't bend your ear longer than necessary here, you can read more > about it at: > > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html > > and in general poke around http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/ to > see what it's made of. > > Enjoy! > > -- > Robin Berjon > robineko — setting new standards > http://robineko.com/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 10:05:46 UTC