public-device-apis@w3.org from April 2009 by date

Thursday, 30 April 2009

• Re: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Arthur Barstow
• RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcos Caceres
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcos Caceres
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Robin Berjon
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcos Caceres

Wednesday, 29 April 2009

• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Arthur Barstow
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Thomas Roessler

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

• ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs Thomas Roessler
• Re: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Arthur Barstow
• Re: Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs Arthur Barstow

Monday, 27 April 2009

• RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Nick Allott

Friday, 24 April 2009

• Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" Arthur Barstow

Tuesday, 14 April 2009

• Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs Thomas Roessler

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2009 17:26:56 UTC