public-device-apis-log@w3.org from September 2020 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Tuesday, 29 September 2020

• Re: [system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) Adrian via GitHub
• Re: [system-wake-lock] Privacy consideration about tracking location (#3) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [system-wake-lock] Request for System Wake Lock use cases (#4) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [system-wake-lock] Privacy consideration about tracking location (#3) Adrian via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Monday, 28 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] chore: add lang="en" (#289) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Update the Changes section (#290) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Friday, 25 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Pranjal Jumde via GitHub

Thursday, 24 September 2020

• Closed: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) Philippe Coval via GitHub
• Re: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) Alastair via GitHub
• Re: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• [geolocation-api] I can't find step 6? (#60) Alastair via GitHub
• [geolocation-api] Add explainer to the spec repo (#59) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] explainer: Expand on why WakeLock.request() still requires an argument. (#288) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Pressure sensor support? (#370) Philippe Coval via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Reword the Security and Privacy Considerations section. (#287) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Pranjal Jumde via GitHub
• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Do not use allow="screen-wake-lock" for iframes (#277) Pranjal Jumde via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Do not use allow="screen-wake-lock" for iframes (#277) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] User prompts to show an active screen-lock should have an associated domain (#278) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Monday, 21 September 2020

• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Saturday, 19 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] Hide failure to acquire a screen wake lock (#247) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Friday, 18 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Stop checking if "acquire the wake lock" succeeds. (#285) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Thursday, 17 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add an Explainer document to the repository. (#286) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Stop checking if "acquire the wake lock" succeeds. (#285) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] New shortname (#257) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) Alice via GitHub
• [screen-wake-lock] Add explainer to the spec repo (#284) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) Thomas Steiner via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Thursday, 10 September 2020

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Ensure the release operation is valid WebIDL (#283) Peter Donald via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Ensure the release operation is valid WebIDL (#283) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Monday, 7 September 2020

• Re: [battery] Detect power saving mode (#9) Robert Linder via GitHub

Thursday, 3 September 2020

• [screen-wake-lock] Security Review (#282) David Chadwick via GitHub

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 13:33:45 UTC