Andrew Meyer via GitHub
Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
- Re: [deviceorientation] Note limited implementation experience (#71) (Friday, 29 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Modernize Respec usage (#165) (Wednesday, 27 March)
- Closed: [deviceorientation] Security and privacy section must be normative (#46) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Security and privacy section must be normative (#46) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Closed: [deviceorientation] Should the API be exposed only to secure context? (#47) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Should the API be exposed only to secure context? (#47) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [sensors] Improve guidance on UI for user consenting (#352) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [sensors] Fix typo (#390) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Closed: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) (Saturday, 16 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [sensors] Add API for requesting permission (#388) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- [sensors] Add API for requesting permission (#388) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [sensors] Fix some links (#387) (Tuesday, 5 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) (Friday, 1 March)
Chris Dumez via GitHub
Domenic Denicola via GitHub
Fuqiao Xue via GitHub
Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
- Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) (Friday, 29 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Thursday, 28 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) (Tuesday, 26 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) (Friday, 22 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Throw "AbortError" DOMException (#162) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Throw "AbortError" DOMException (#162) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Tuesday, 19 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Make WakeLock require user gesture before activation (#135) (Monday, 18 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Make WakeLock require user gesture before activation (#135) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Monday, 18 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Thursday, 14 March)
- [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Integrate optional permission prompting (#158) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Restrict status reporting for wake lock (#125) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Tuesday, 12 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Monday, 11 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Monday, 11 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Friday, 8 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) (Thursday, 7 March)
- [wake-lock] Make WakeLock constructable (#154) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Low battery while wake lock is on should cancel the lock (#132) (Monday, 4 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) (Monday, 4 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Restrict status reporting for wake lock (#125) (Monday, 4 March)
- [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) (Friday, 1 March)
- Closed: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) (Friday, 1 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) (Friday, 1 March)
machenmusik via GitHub
Maryam Mehr via GitHub
Mrunal Kapade via GitHub
Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub
Paul Neave via GitHub
Reilly Grant via GitHub
- [deviceorientation] Add integration with the Permissions API (#70) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Wednesday, 20 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Monday, 18 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) (Friday, 15 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) (Thursday, 14 March)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) (Wednesday, 13 March)
- [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Saturday, 9 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) (Thursday, 7 March)
- Re: [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) (Friday, 1 March)
Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
Thomas Steiner via GitHub
Wanming Lin via GitHub
Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
Last message date: Friday, 29 March 2019 10:50:45 UTC