public-device-apis-log@w3.org from March 2019 by date

Friday, 29 March 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Note limited implementation experience (#71) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Thursday, 28 March 2019

• Re: [html-media-capture] [meta] Translations tracker (#27) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Wednesday, 27 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Modernize Respec usage (#165) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Tuesday, 26 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Monday, 25 March 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Paul Neave via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub

Friday, 22 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Thursday, 21 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] WakeLock and Page Life Cycle (#139) Mrunal Kapade via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Mrunal Kapade via GitHub

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

• [deviceorientation] Add integration with the Permissions API (#70) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Attempt to improve the permission flow/steps (#164) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [deviceorientation] Security and privacy section must be normative (#46) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Security and privacy section must be normative (#46) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [deviceorientation] Should the API be exposed only to secure context? (#47) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Should the API be exposed only to secure context? (#47) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Tuesday, 19 March 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Improve guidance on UI for user consenting (#352) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix typo (#390) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Throw "AbortError" DOMException (#162) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Throw "AbortError" DOMException (#162) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Throw "AbortError" DOMException (#162) Wanming Lin via GitHub

Monday, 18 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Make WakeLock require user gesture before activation (#135) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Make WakeLock require user gesture before activation (#135) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Saturday, 16 March 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Friday, 15 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Require user activation (#160) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Thursday, 14 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• [wake-lock] SecurityError vs NotAllowedError (#159) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add API for requesting permission (#388) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) machenmusik via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Nicholas Butko [8th Wall] via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Maryam Mehr via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) machenmusik via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Tuesday, 12 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) Andrew Meyer via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Integrate optional permission prompting (#158) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Restrict status reporting for wake lock (#125) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Thomas Steiner via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add API for requesting permission (#388) Thomas Steiner via GitHub

Monday, 11 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• [sensors] Add API for requesting permission (#388) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Saturday, 9 March 2019

• [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Friday, 8 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Thursday, 7 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Consider making WakeLock constructable (#154) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Make WakeLock constructable (#154) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Thomas Steiner via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Subtleties of using Document are not specced (#141) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Tuesday, 5 March 2019

• Re: [magnetometer] Fix a broken link (#52) Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix some links (#387) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix some links (#387) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 4 March 2019

• Closed: [wake-lock] Low battery while wake lock is on should cancel the lock (#132) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Restrict status reporting for wake lock (#125) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Friday, 1 March 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• [wake-lock] A broken script shouldn't be able to put the whole system in a broken state until page reloaded, I think something is broken. (#151) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] What if WakeLockRequest is garbage collected? (#128) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests (#111) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Rewrite of most of the algorithms to be much more formal and simple (#150) Wanming Lin via GitHub

Last message date: Friday, 29 March 2019 10:50:45 UTC