public-device-apis-log@w3.org from April 2019 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Allow to abort a request using an aborted signal (#183) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Losing reference to a WakeLock object is a bug or intended behavior (#199) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Allow to abort a request using an aborted signal (#183) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Allow to abort a request using an aborted signal (#183) Jake Archibald via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Fix Marcos' issues #186 and #185 (#197) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] WakeLockPermissionDescriptor should be it's own section (#186) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] obtain permission seems wrong (#187) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Fix Marcos' issues #186 and #185 (#197) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] In obtain permission: don't co-opt resultPromise - it's creating a custom permission model (#198) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add more type info (#196) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add more type info (#196) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Monday, 29 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal and fix the counter (#183) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal and fix the counter (#183) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Clarify platform wake lock's internal slots have different contexts (#192) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Thursday, 25 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Stop referencing "feature name" from the Feature Policy spec (#190) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Wednesday, 24 April 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Evan Bacon via GitHub

Saturday, 20 April 2019

• [wake-lock] obtain permission seems wrong (#187) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• [wake-lock] WakeLockPermissionDescriptor should be it's own section (#186) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• [wake-lock] User real instances of things (#185) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Thursday, 18 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: few more fixes (#182) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: few more fixes (#182) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Wednesday, 17 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Domenic Denicola via GitHub

Tuesday, 16 April 2019

• Closed: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Make NotAllowedError point to its definition in WebIDL. (#76) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Monday, 15 April 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Make NotAllowedError point to its definition in WebIDL. (#76) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Tuesday, 9 April 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add permission request API (#68) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 8 April 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Add API for requesting permission to receive device motion / orientation events (#57) Keith Ito via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Chris Dumez via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Introduce rate limiting to prevent wake lock abuse (#124) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Introduce rate limiting to prevent wake lock abuse (#124) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Friday, 5 April 2019

• Re: [deviceorientation] Remove trailing comma from the PermissionState enum. (#73) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Remove trailing comma from the PermissionState enum. (#73) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Thursday, 4 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Need maximum screen brightness mode (#129) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Need maximum screen brightness mode (#129) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Wednesday, 3 April 2019

• Closed: [wake-lock] More diplay power modes (#84) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] More diplay power modes (#84) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [deviceorientation] Update spec metadata (#72) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Tuesday, 2 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Thomas Steiner via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Monday, 1 April 2019

• Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Abortion is a bit weird (#171) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) Thomas Steiner via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
• Closed: [deviceorientation] Add non-normative text describing the current deviceorientationabsolute implementation status (#60) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2019 21:00:31 UTC