Re: [sensors] Investigate possibility of synchronizing coordinate systems from Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub on 2018-01-19 (public-device-apis-log@w3.org from January 2018)

From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:12:34 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-358936850-1516360353-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I am wondering whether

```
Sensor {
readonly attribute SensorOptions? options;
}
```
is the best way or not. I think most other APIs apply the individual options directly on the object, like

```
Sensor {
  readonly attribute number frequency;
  readonly attribute USVString coordinateSystem;
}

Basically a bit like they were applied to the object,

```
sensor = {}
options = { coordinateSystem: "screen" }
Object.assign(sensor, options)

sensor.coordinateSystem
> "screen"
```

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kenchris
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/257#issuecomment-358936850 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 19 January 2018 11:12:37 UTC