W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > December 2018

Re: [wake-lock] WakeLock and Page Life Cycle (#139)

From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:20:57 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-447410229-1544811656-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Actually, I could see an argument that `"screen"` wouldn't need to prevent `frozen`, and a device whose screen takes much less power than its CPU could take advantage of that. If you want to be both visible and handle events, take both wakelocks?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jyasskin
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/wake-lock/issues/139#issuecomment-447410229 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 14 December 2018 18:20:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:56 UTC