W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > December 2018

Re: [wake-lock] WakeLock and Page Life Cycle (#139)

From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:20:57 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-447410229-1544811656-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Actually, I could see an argument that `"screen"` wouldn't need to prevent `frozen`, and a device whose screen takes much less power than its CPU could take advantage of that. If you want to be both visible and handle events, take both wakelocks?

GitHub Notification of comment by jyasskin
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/wake-lock/issues/139#issuecomment-447410229 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 14 December 2018 18:20:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:56 UTC