Re: [sensors] Define WebDriver extension API for test automation

@Honry Looks great!

[2] Should this have an ID attached to it? Or can you not have multiple types of the same sensor?
[3] Same as [2] and should this have the fields getSensorShouldFail and startShouldFail? Or are those not that useful in the use case for this and its best to keep it minimal?

Opens:
[2] I think if there is a choice here I would lean towards not having a flag, makes it easier for config especially from a WPT infra standpoint, namely for [wpt.fyi](wpt.fyi); however, this isn't a huge deal if there is a required command line flag. 




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kereliuk
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/363#issuecomment-383603341 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 23 April 2018 14:51:34 UTC