- From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:19:10 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
> Quite the contrary, I feel it would be confusing to use RFC 2119 terms in a definition. I wasn't suggesting that either (i.e. the "perform a security check" name was clearer). I'm just saying that the offending PR (#280) introduces numerous issues and ambiguities which were absent from the spec prior to it, and I'm not quite sure what problem it's trying to solve. This new PR doesn't solve all of the problems introduced in #280, hence my suggestion is simply to roll back the previous PR, and move from there. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobie Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/pull/288#issuecomment-332167144 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 11:19:06 UTC