W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [sensors] Should a "suspended" state be added

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:11:30 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-332152257-1506420677-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I don't understand how this PR resolves this issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/223#issuecomment-332152257 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 10:11:20 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub: "Re: [sensors] What's the rationale of moving security checks outside of normative requirements?"
Previous message: Tobie Langel via GitHub: "Re: [sensors] What's the rationale of moving security checks outside of normative requirements?"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub: "Re: [sensors] Should a "suspended" state be added"
Maybe reply: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub: "Re: [sensors] Should a "suspended" state be added"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:54 UTC