Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed

> Notably, "exposed" (emphasis mine) in the above normative text does not link to its formal definition, thus the behavior is currently underspecified AFAICT.

Yes, that's because it's the generic computer science term that's used here, not the dfn.

The spec's pretty explicit in the "exposed" dfn, and then again in the bindings. The note x-ref is good enough imho, as the spec is supposed to be taken as a whole (see [conforming implementation](https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-conforming-implementation)).

That said, I [just fixed](https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/464) a small normative nit with the "exposed" dfn and turned it into an algorithm, which I think makes it stand out more.



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/314#issuecomment-337159310 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 08:36:19 UTC