public-device-apis-log@w3.org from October 2017 by date

Monday, 30 October 2017

• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Interface for user-involving calibration? Martijn Thé via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Geoffrey Sneddon via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Interface for user-involving calibration? Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Interface for user-involving calibration? Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Friday, 27 October 2017

• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Wanming Lin via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Thursday, 26 October 2017

• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Wanming Lin via GitHub

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] Add testSuiteURI Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Tuesday, 24 October 2017

• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Ian Clelland via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Generic Sensor & Wake Lock API use cases Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 23 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Generic Sensor & Wake Lock API use cases Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Ian Clelland via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Clarify CONTRIBUTING Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• [sensors] Generic Sensor & Wake Lock API use cases Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Mounir Lamouri via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Ian Clelland via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Mounir Lamouri via GitHub
• Re: [html-media-capture] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [html-media-capture] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Clarify CONTRIBUTING Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Adopt 'test as you commit' policy Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Wanming Lin via GitHub
• [sensors] Editorial - 6.2 Terence Eden via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Wanming Lin via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Wanming Lin via GitHub

Friday, 20 October 2017

• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] TAG wide review (DRAFT) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] TAG wide review (DRAFT) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

Thursday, 19 October 2017

• Re: [vibration] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Wanming Lin via GitHub

Wednesday, 18 October 2017

• [sensors] TAG wide review (DRAFT) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Make markup valid Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [wake-lock] [meta] web-platform-tests Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children, add Feature Policy integration Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Adopt "test as you commit" policy Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Remove the extra secure context check Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Remove the extra secure context check Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 16 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Sensor discovery Lars Knudsen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• [sensors] The explicit secure context check is not needed Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [sensors] Add [SecureContext] to derived interfaces Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Friday, 13 October 2017

• Closed: [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix Tobie's URL Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix Tobie's URL Tobie Langel via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Use the 'device sensor' term in the Scope section Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Add a diagram illustrating the Model Rick Waldron via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [DO NOT MERGE] Add preliminary interactive diagram. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add a diagram illustrating the Model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Remove nullable member type from SensorOptions.frequency and fix warning Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Monday, 9 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Relation to Feature Policy Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Saturday, 7 October 2017

• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub

Friday, 6 October 2017

• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? chaals via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• [ambient-light] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• [sensors] [meta] Address remaining TAG review issues Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Thursday, 5 October 2017

• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [magnetometer] Local coordinates could use further detail/examples Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Local coordinates could use further detail/examples Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Closed: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Privacy implications? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Shouldn't need Web Service to compute declination Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [magnetometer] Shouldn't need Web Service to compute declination Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [magnetometer] Should we expose heading? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [magnetometer] Should we expose heading? Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [ambient-light] Ambient Light Sensors to detect RGB colors Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Wednesday, 4 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Rework the 'Connect to Sensor' abstract operation Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Remove nullable member type from SensorOptions.frequency and fix warning Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• [sensors] [meta] Wide review tracker Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 2 October 2017

• Re: [sensors] Remove nullable member type from SensorOptions.frequency and fix warning Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Fix Previous Version metadata Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Allow use in same-origin children Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Add references to usecases note Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Sensor.timeStamp could be clarified Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Introduce the Reading Timestamp concept Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [sensors] Introduce the Reading Timestamp concept Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
• Closed: [sensors] Future proofing terminology Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub

Last message date: Monday, 30 October 2017 15:09:00 UTC