Tuesday, 28 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
Monday, 27 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
Friday, 24 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
Thursday, 23 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings
- Re: [html-media-capture] Update test suite
- Re: [html-media-capture] Update test suite
- Re: [html-media-capture] Update test suite
- [html-media-capture] Update test suite
Wednesday, 22 February 2017
- [accelerometer] No way to get isolated gravity
- Closed: [html-media-capture] VideoFacingModeEnum as the capture attribute's value
- Re: [html-media-capture] Fix #4: Make @capture an enumerated attribute
- Closed: [wake-lock] Review the Privacy & Security section
- Re: [sensors] Sensor.timeStamp could be clarified
Tuesday, 21 February 2017
- Re: [html-media-capture] Fix #4: Make @capture an enumerated attribute
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
- Closed: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
Monday, 20 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
- Re: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
Friday, 17 February 2017
- Re: [html-media-capture] Fix #4: Make @capture an enumerated attribute
- Re: [html-media-capture] Fix #4: Make @capture an enumerated attribute
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- Re: [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
- [sensors] Provide the DeviceOrientation sensor
Thursday, 16 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [html-media-capture] Use https links
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Closed: [wake-lock] The spec is unnecessarily strict in regard to promise handling
- Re: [wake-lock] Fix promise handling
Wednesday, 15 February 2017
- Closed: [wake-lock] Clarify wake lock state transitions when the device is manually locked
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- [wake-lock] Clarify wake lock state transitions when the device is manually locked
- Re: [sensors] Javascript 120Hz devicemotion events for high end inertial applications
- Re: [wake-lock] Review the Privacy & Security section
Tuesday, 14 February 2017
- Re: [wake-lock] Fix promise handling
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint
- Re: [sensors] Sensor discovery
- Re: [sensors] Sensor discovery
- Re: [sensors] Sensor discovery
- Closed: [wake-lock] TAG feedback on wake-lock API
Monday, 13 February 2017
- Re: [wake-lock] TAG feedback on wake-lock API
- Re: [accelerometer] "includesGravity" vs "includeGravity"
- Closed: [accelerometer] "includesGravity" vs "includeGravity"
- Re: [accelerometer] "includesGravity" vs "includeGravity"
- [accelerometer] `includesGravity` vs `includeGravity`
- Re: [wake-lock] The spec is unnecessarily strict in regard to promise handling
- Re: [wake-lock] The spec is unnecessarily strict in regard to promise handling
- Re: [wake-lock] The spec is unnecessarily strict in regard to promise handling
- [sensors] What if setting a negative frequency?
Friday, 10 February 2017
- Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state
- Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state
Thursday, 9 February 2017
Wednesday, 8 February 2017
Tuesday, 7 February 2017
Monday, 6 February 2017
Friday, 3 February 2017
- Re: [magnetometer] Security and Privacy Considerations
- Re: [magnetometer] Security and Privacy Considerations
- Re: [magnetometer] Provide API to access uncalibrated magnetometer values
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings.
- Re: [magnetometer] Add support for raw
- Re: [magnetometer] Add support for raw
Thursday, 2 February 2017
- Re: [accelerometer] Align Accelerometer interface with the Generic Sensor API
- Re: [accelerometer] Align Accelerometer interface with the Generic Sensor API
- Re: [proximity] Define distance, max, and near in the model, add cross-references
Wednesday, 1 February 2017
- Re: [magnetometer] Local coordinates could use further detail/examples
- Re: [proximity] Adapt Proximity to the latest changes in the Generic Sensor API
- Re: [ambient-light] Auto reporting mode is not defined
- Re: [proximity] Adapt Proximity to the latest changes in the Generic Sensor API
- Re: [magnetometer] Security and Privacy Considerations
- Closed: [magnetometer] Security and Privacy Considerations
- Re: [magnetometer] Model duplicates WebIDL
- Closed: [magnetometer] Model duplicates WebIDL
- Re: [magnetometer] Who is you, we, etc.?
- Closed: [magnetometer] Who is you, we, etc.?
- Re: [magnetometer] Shouldn't need Web Service to compute declination
- Re: [magnetometer] Add support for raw
- Re: [magnetometer] Local coordinates could use further detail/examples
- Re: [magnetometer] Shouldn't need Web Service to compute declination
- Re: [magnetometer] Adapt magnetometer after remove_reading
- Re: [proximity] Adapt Proximity to the latest changes in the Generic Sensor API
- Re: [gyroscope] Adapt Gyroscope to the latest changes in the Generic Sensor API