W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [sensors] LaughometerSensor vs Laughometer?

From: Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:38:31 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-247364668-1473953910-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@rwaldron : Regarding point 3. A list of available sensors can be 
easily produced programmatically ..

Presence of  say AmbientLightSensor in Object.keys(sensors), does not 
mean the system has a AmbientLightSensor,  it means the browser simply
 has bindings for AmbientLight sensor. We need to make a sync call 
like start() to find out if the underlying platform actually has a 
sensor.

Also with Android API level 24, there is a concept of dynamic sensor 
callback which is used for receiving notifications from the 
SensorManager when dynamic sensors are connected or disconnected.

Do you want  proposed global object `sensor` object to hold only 
available sensors for that platform ? 
Does that mean we need to update the `sensor`  object every time a 
sensor's connection state changes ?

I understand the "grouping related classes under a namespace" 
reasoning,  but cannot see benefits beyond that.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riju
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/127#issuecomment-247364668 using
 your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2016 15:38:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:34:21 UTC