- From: Marcos Cáceres via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:07:45 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
WebIDL now supports namespaces, so you could get a real "sensors" namespace... however, I'm not sure why WebIDL namespaces are currently limited to operations (and don't seem to allow attributes, which would serve as the constructors)? @domenic, is something funky about the API design here? As currently proposed (using `Sensors.whatevs`) in the OP, the constructors would be statics on the Sensor interface, which is not really what we want IMO. I think we want @rwaldron's design of, for example: ```JS const acc = new sensors.Accelerometer(); ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by marcoscaceres Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/127#issuecomment-246907779 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 05:07:54 UTC