- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 07:13:54 +0000
- To: public-design-tokens-log@w3.org
> I wonder if we should be a bit more descriptive in the names of the channels/components for clarity, readability Yes, a fully typed object with descriptive names would be good. But it isn't clear from your example which value should be used. `$hex` could be a specified fallback in case an implementation does not support wide gamut color formats, but how does an implementation decide between `$oklch` and `$display-p3`? > potentially allowing for 'none' values This would be nice! Certain interpolations are only possible when specific channels have a value of `none`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/137#issuecomment-1801217895 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2023 07:13:56 UTC