Re: [community-group] Implicit vs. explicit typing in composite tokens (#199)

Correct that there is no issue with a field supporting multiple types in principle.

But the specification doesn't explain or define how to parse this.
This is a critical and fundamental issue.
It can not be waved away :)

If the specification wants to support mixed-type fields it must add a section on how to analyse a value and determine which value it really it is.

---

> Technically, we already have this ambiguous definition with the "fontFamily" and "fontWeight" properties

That is a bug, not a reason to add more ambiguity :)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/199#issuecomment-1374586443 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Saturday, 7 January 2023 19:36:44 UTC