- From: Steve Dodier-Lazaro via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:41:17 +0000
- To: public-design-tokens-log@w3.org
In SD format: ```json { "color": { "value": "#444", "value_hc": "#222" }, "size": { "value": 24, "value_breakpoint-md": 32 }, "fontFamily": { "value": "Scto Grotesk", "value_lang-el": "Noto Sans", "value_lang-jp": "Noto Sans" } } ``` In W3C token format, I'm not sure what the best would be. I could have the same naive approach: ```json { "color": { "$value": "#444", "$value_hc": "#222" }, "size": { "$value": "24px", "$value_breakpoint-md": "32px" }, "fontFamily": { "$value": "Scto Grotesk", "$value_lang-el": "Noto Sans", "$value_lang-jp": "Noto Sans" } } ``` Or one with an `$extraValues` that simplifies tooling support for such extra values, and also saves tool users from declaring the names of the custom value fields: ```json { "color": { "$value": "#444", "$extraValues": [ "high-contrast": "#222" ] }, "size": { "$value": "24px", "$extraValues": [ "breakpoint-md": "32px", ] }, "fontFamily": { "$value": "Scto Grotesk", "$extraValues": [ "lang-el": "Noto Sans", "lang-jp": "Noto Sans" ] } } ``` Or this could technically be hosted under `$extensions` and be invisible for the token spec itself. Because the W3C spec has a wider range of consumers than SD, I wouldn't necessarily propose the same format, but I haven't yet given it enough thought to have an opinion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Sidnioulz Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/169#issuecomment-1371988605 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2023 09:41:19 UTC