- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 18:20:44 +0000
- To: public-design-tokens-log@w3.org
@kaelig I am unsure how this works in practice? It sounds like we have a split track. - track A: select corporations - track B: the rest of the community If part of the design work of the format is done for long periods of time on track A then the community is giving feedback on a format that no longer exists. Track B has no knowledge of the current state of the format. The call to implement is now also a bit weird : https://twitter.com/DesignTokens/status/1536761206823739393 What are we implementing and giving feedback on? ---- Another concern is conflicting feedback. The current state seems and feels as if track A is prioritised and feedback on track B is largely not acted on. Since we can not see anything from track A, are they aware of the feedback given here? ------ All these concerns and many more are exactly why transparency and doing all design work in public is part of the W3C process. -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/170#issuecomment-1272600485 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2022 18:20:46 UTC