Re: [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)

Thank you @c1rrus, I assumed that was the reasoning around not including in the v1 of the spec. Also, I love the idea of having an array of values in a `usedFor` type property. This is similar to what we have in our internal token structure so works great. 

I'm happy if you want to close this issue for now, as I don't think there is a clear solution from the spec point of view. I just wanted to check there wasn't a better option.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mkeftz
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/104#issuecomment-1014979125 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2022 00:49:59 UTC