Saturday, 29 January 2022
Friday, 28 January 2022
Thursday, 27 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Typography type feedback (#102)
- Re: [community-group] Optional "tags" property on tokens (#109)
- Re: [community-group] Optional "tags" property on tokens (#109)
Wednesday, 26 January 2022
Tuesday, 25 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Can extensions be applied on the group level? (#106)
- Re: [community-group] Reserve top-level `$schema` property? (#107)
- Re: [community-group] WIP: Add data model section (#93)
- Re: [community-group] Typography type feedback (#102)
- Re: [community-group] Typography type feedback (#102)
- [community-group] Final revisions before next draft (#108)
- [community-group] Closed Pull Request: Moves group properties into a metadata property
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Closed: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Closed: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- [community-group] Merged Pull Request: Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate
- Closed: [community-group] Disambiguate RFC 2119 keywords where appropriate (#77)
- Re: [community-group] Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate (#94)
Monday, 24 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Reserve top-level `$schema` property? (#107)
- Re: [community-group] Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate (#94)
- Re: [community-group] WIP: Add data model section (#93)
Friday, 21 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Reserve top-level `$schema` property? (#107)
- [community-group] Reserve top-level `$schema` property? (#107)
- [community-group] Can extensions be applied on the group level? (#106)
- Re: [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)
- Re: [community-group] Shadow type feedback (#100)
Thursday, 20 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Loosen up the color type (#79)
- Closed: [community-group] Token types - optional or required (#63)
- Re: [community-group] Token types - optional or required (#63)
Wednesday, 19 January 2022
Tuesday, 18 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Group format (#105)
- [community-group] Group format (#105)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)
- Re: [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)
Monday, 17 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
Saturday, 15 January 2022
Friday, 14 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- [community-group] Should the spec include more semantic types? (#104)
Thursday, 13 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] Typography type feedback (#102)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] [RFC] Theming (#2)
- Re: [community-group] WIP: Update composite types chapter to reflect decision made on issue #63 (#86)
- [community-group] Transition type feedback (#103)
- Re: [community-group] Gradient type feedback (#101)
- Re: [community-group] Shadow type feedback (#100)
- [community-group] Typography type feedback (#102)
- [community-group] Gradient type feedback (#101)
- [community-group] Shadow type (#100)
- [community-group] Border type (#99)
- [community-group] Stroke style type (#98)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] [RFC] Theming (#2)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
Wednesday, 12 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] [RFC] Theming (#2)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- [community-group] How to do tokens that share a name with a group (#97)
- Re: [community-group] [RFC] Theming (#2)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
Tuesday, 11 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] Should composites be part of the MVP specification? (#54)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Disambiguate RFC 2119 keywords where appropriate (#77)
Monday, 10 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate [redux] (#96)
- [community-group] Closed Pull Request: Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate [redux]
- Re: [community-group] Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate [redux] (#96)
- [community-group] Pull Request: Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate [redux]
- [community-group] Merged Pull Request: Update dependencies and override colors version to the latest good one
- Re: [community-group] Update dependencies and override colors version to the latest good one (#95)
- [community-group] Pull Request: Update dependencies and override colors version to the latest good one
- Re: [community-group] Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate (#94)
- [community-group] Pull Request: Capitalize RFC 2119 keywords when appropriate
Saturday, 8 January 2022
- Closed: [community-group] YAML as an alternate format (#92)
- Re: [community-group] YAML as an alternate format (#92)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] WIP: Add data model section (#93)
- [community-group] Pull Request: WIP: Add data model section
- Re: [community-group] YAML as an alternate format (#92)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
Friday, 7 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- [community-group] YAML as an alternate format (#92)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Re: [community-group] Moves group properties into a metadata property (#89)
- Re: [community-group] Disambiguate RFC 2119 keywords where appropriate (#77)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
Wednesday, 5 January 2022
- [community-group] Merged Pull Request: Remove `Duration` from types to do list
- Re: [community-group] Remove `Duration` from types to do list (#90)
- [community-group] High contrast colors (#91)
- Re: [community-group] Pre-defined composite type for refering color modifications (e.g. rgba) (#88)
Tuesday, 4 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Remove `Duration` from types to do list (#90)
- [community-group] Pull Request: Remove `Duration` from types to do list
Monday, 3 January 2022
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Re: [community-group] Moves group properties into a metadata property (#89)
- [community-group] Pull Request: Moves group properties into a metadata property
- Re: [community-group] WIP: Update composite types chapter to reflect decision made on issue #63 (#86)
- Re: [community-group] update(spec): Add `type` property to file and group levels (#87)
- [community-group] Merged Pull Request: update(spec): Add `type` property to file and group levels
- Re: [community-group] update(spec): Add `type` property to file and group levels (#87)
- Re: [community-group] Disambiguate RFC 2119 keywords where appropriate (#77)
- Re: [community-group] Group & file level properties (#72)
- Re: [community-group] Token name - reserved words (#61)