Core Vocab 1e

Hi folks, I just shipped a version of core vocab (1e) with yesterday's
date [I did it at Dublin airport waiting for my plane]

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/corevocabulary/080129.html


The time has come to give this a final critical review before
publication.

These are the things I am aware need discussion or fixing. I would like
these on the agenda for Monday if that's OK, Rotan?

Jo

1. Links to Ontology

These are speculative or poor or in any case refer to an Editor's draft.
I don't know that W3 Process allows such references. We have no other
place to refer to. I propose dropping the references and making a
general statement about relationship to the ontology in section 2.3.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Drop References to Ontology and explain future
relationship in 2.3

2. Need to confirm namespace binding. (Matt?)

3. Under input devices: the descriptions are very weak, e.g. "a
trackball is a trackball". We could do with some references, if anyone
can dream some up.

ACTION: Please contribute

4. Remaining Tables of Enumerations - if we are done with adding members
I will remove the spare row.

5. Need a reference for useFormatAttribute

ACTION: Please supply a reference if you know anything about this

6. Need a reference to ECMAscript MP and need a decision on any other
script variants.

ACTION: Please supply a reference

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: EcmaScript MP (correctly spelled) is the only
member of the ScriptSupport Enumeration

7. Need final confirmation of contributors to the Vocabulary Submission
Process under Acknowledgements.

ACTION: If you contributed please put your hand up now.

8. NB the change to allowable datatypes under 3 - which makes reference
to the DDR API document which will spell out what you can have in
vocabularies.

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2008 18:18:54 UTC