- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:49:57 -0000
- To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>
In response to José's contribution from last Nov, I have few comments on this and agree with almost all his points, and will adjust the next draft accordingly. Ref XML Schema definition of enum for for Input Devices: I don't think this is necessary really - especially since the enum is supposed to be extensible with values from other name spaces. I will remove the "other" entry as Jose suggests and refer to this point in the text. Jo --- Commenting [1] Editorial Comments: Abstract --------- + This document describes the Device Description Repository Core Vocabulary for Content Adaptation in the Mobile Web, described in the charter of the Device Descriptions Working Group, as well as the process by which the vocabulary was defined Introduction ------------- + The vocabulary makes reference to the ontology for the Web Delivery Context which is being developed by the UWA [reference to the UWA -WG] Working Group. [UWA-Ontology]. + I would suggest to drop the sentence "Where necessary, the ontology can be extended." or to rephrase it to make it more clear the intended meaning 3 Properties ------------- + Reading the document is not clear to me what is the actual property identifier. I know that it is supposed to be the name in the section title such as "3.1 vendor" but I think it will be better to make explicit the actual property identifier. Suggested: 3.1 'vendor' property 3.1.1 Description bla,bla 3.1.2 Property Identifier vendor 3.1.3 type bla, bla + 3.5.6 Identified as an important property by the DDWG in its Top N finding. [Put a reference to the document] Present in UAProf [Put a reference to UAProf] B Acknowledgements A small change, + José Manuel Cantera Fonseca, Telefónica Investigación y Desarrollo --- Additional Comments --- + The document does not talk about namespaces and property namespacing, I think it is important to indicate that the Core Vocabulary Properties are within a namespace identified by a URI to be defined + Enumerations. I think we need an XMLSchema definition of the enumerations described for certain properties in the vocabulary, such as inputDevices. Also, the same comment as in the property id applies here. We need to make explicit that the values put in the table under the value column are the actual values that the enumeration can contain i.e. those strings. I think this can be made explicit by means of the XMLSchema enumeration definition. Last but not least, I'm a bit worried about the 'other' value you mention in the draft. I think we need to drop it from the value column and say that specific implementations can provide more values to this enumeration. Nothing more so far Best Regards [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/corevocabulary/071204.html
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 11:50:19 UTC