- From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:49:00 -0500
- To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>
Res.C(2) : For clarity, I would like it in addition. This would be consistent with the provision of overloaded methods that only have strings and would be used conveniently in some simple use cases. ---R -----Original Message----- From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Rabin Sent: 26 February 2008 10:45 To: jmcf@tid.es Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org Subject: RE: Final chance, for now, to offer opinion on Simple API [was Continuation of discussion from today's call] I see that both Rotan and you are looking for and elaboration of Resolution C(2): Res.C(2) +1 to keep PropertyName, factory method, and use in SimplePropertyRef constructor. For the sake of clarity, are you saying that the only constructor should be of this form or are you saying that you'd like that in addition. The first interpretation is inconsistent with the decision to provide overloaded methods that have only Strings. [...]
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 11:49:20 UTC