- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:19:52 -0000
- To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>
I agree that it would limit the generality so think that this should be WebBrowser as Jose suggests. Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: jmcf@tid.es [mailto:jmcf@tid.es] > Sent: 12 February 2008 10:13 > To: Jo Rabin > Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Core Vocabulary 1f > > Hi, > > The name 'UserAgent' for an aspect is very dangerous. I mean, a device > could have different user agents (the MMS Client, the WAP Push Client, > etc, etc), so I would name it "WebBrowser" to express precisely that it > is the user agent that corresponds to the browser used to access the web > > Best Regards > > Jo Rabin escribió: > > This can now be found at > > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/corevocabulary/080211.html > > > > and differences from the previous draft can be viewed by following this > > link > > > > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2 > > FMWI%2FDDWG%2FDrafts%2Fcorevocabulary%2F080129&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3. > > org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FDDWG%2Fdrafts%2Fcorevocabulary%2F080211.html > > > > or > > > > http://tinyurl.com/35u3c6 > > > > > > Two issues remain outstanding. > > > > 1. The relationship to the UWA Ontology section is not correct in the > > initial paragraph. > > > > 2. The IRI of the Core Vocabulary namespace is to be confirmed. > > > > Jo > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 14:20:13 UTC