- From: Andrea Trasatti <andrea@trasatti.it>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:27:28 +0100
- To: public-ddwg@w3.org
- Cc: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
- Message-Id: <6C2C2CC1-443B-45D3-89D5-3F51AD1B68AC@trasatti.it>
Updated with usecase number 2. What did you think about the text of usecase 3? I don't get it. - Andrea Il giorno 20/mar/07, alle ore 16:59, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I have started with some use cases regarding device description > structures [1]. Two of them are envisaged but not yet written :). > > You are welcome to contribute with more use cases, like those that > Kevin and Andrea has mentioned these days in the list. > > Feedback from the public and group members is also needed > > Thanks and best regards > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/wiki/ > DeviceDescriptionStructuresUseCases > > Rotan Hanrahan escribió: >>> This would assume a common syntax for representing the family rules. >>> >> And this is precisely where I think the work that José is leading >> will help us. >> >> ---Rotan >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Smith, Kevin, VF-Group [mailto:Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com] >> Sent: 20 March 2007 15:48 >> To: Rotan Hanrahan; public-ddwg@w3.org >> Subject: RE: Device description structures and families >> >> Hi Rotan, >> >> Thanks for the clarification... >> >> Another use case is content filtering, e.g. indicating that 'this >> family gets a movie, while this family gets an image'. Resolution >> of the expression would involve confirming the requesting device >> is of a given family. Then the appropriate link or object would be >> presented. >> >> As both yourself and José say, there could be benefit in sharing >> some of these family classifications: for example, a games >> publisher could create a set of rules as to which devices can >> support their latest games for the best user experience (mature >> J2ME, good CPU, decent resolution etc.) and this could be >> represented as a family (possibly namespace bound, eg >> gamescorp.bestSupport). They could also provide minimum criteria >> for legacy games (gamescorp.justSupport). Maybe the provisioning >> of these family rules can be in a DDR extension, or it could be >> possible in the query to the DDR to ask for the family rules to be >> fetched from an external source (such as gamescorp themselves). >> This would assume a common syntax for representing the family rules. >> >> Cheers >> Kevin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 23 March 2007 11:28:02 UTC