- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:24:40 -0400
- To: info@sonoffconsulting.com, public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
- Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org, public-bpwg@w3.org
Thanks Raymond for the comments. I'm adding them to the list of all the last-call comments that we're processing, so that we can get back a more official reply from everyone. I think your points are quite valid. I didn't see any comments on one-web or adaptation here unless I missed part of the original e-mail so I assume this is a separate discussion. Thanks! Sean On 3/14/07, Luca Passani <luca.passani@openwave.com> wrote: > > > I suspect you got the wrong list and wanted to post this to public-bpwg. > > Anyway, those limits are created to make sure that a BP page is viewable on > low end devices, so you cannot simply raise the limits, or you would make > the page inaccessible to millions and millions of potential mobile users. > > Also, I suspect you are being fooled by the one web idea promoted by W3C. No > mobile web practitioners will tell you that one can create a web page that > will work acceptably well on feature phones. You need to create separate > versions: a web site and a .mobi site which complies to a styleguide of your > choice. > > http://www.fiercedeveloper.com/story/editor-s-corner/2007-03-13 > > Luca > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Raymond Sonoff > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:35 PM > To: public-ddwg@w3.org > Cc: scsi001@sonoffconsulting.com > Subject: From Raymond Sonoff --- "RE: Last Call on mobileOK Basic Tests > [deadline extended!]" > > > Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:20 p.m. EDT > > To Whom It May Concern: > > SUMMARY: > Listed below are some specifics that I suggest be considered either as > candidates for possible modifications to or extensions of the existing > mobileOK Basic Tests. The specific Web site for which I am seeking to > achieve MobileOK status is at URL address http://sonoffconsulting.mobi/. > NOTE: The top-level "dotMobi" domain's contents will be a pared-down version > of its counterpart, namely: the long-established > http://sonoffconsulting.com/ Web site which was designed to Web standards > and which exemplifies conformance to W3C's XHTML, CSS, and WCAG (priority > levels 1, 2, and 3, inclusive) recommendations on each and every page within > the sonoffconsulting.com domain. > > REQUESTS FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION: > 1. Increase the Page Limits from 10K for markup to at least 20K (preferably > 40K), along with a commensurate increase for the total Page Limit to at > least 40K. > 2. Allow for accesskey combinations to be used beyond just the ten (10) > numeric values. > 3. Allow for incorporating hyperlinks to external (non-mobileOK) Web site's > pages. > > SUPPORTING COMMENTS FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE-STATED REQUESTS, RESPECTIVELY: > 1. I wish to provide more than a token amount of content to anyone who > accesses any Web site that I develop, refine, and make available to > visitors, users, clients, prospects, or customers to those Web sites. > Providing alternative text, title text, and wanting to offer two Cascading > Style Sheets (one for the screen; the second, for print-related operations > -- as are currently exemplified for all Web pages in the > sonoffconsulting.com domain), the current upper limits are overly > restrictive and something has to be sacrificed (unnecessarily, I feel) to > pass that test element. QUESTION: Why not allow for the multi-CSS > stylesheets to allow for "intelligent word-wrapped" printing as a Web Best > Practice for everyone to incorporate into their Web site designs? > 2. I currently employ thirty-six (36) accesskey combinations on the > sonoffconsulting.com domain, and these keyboard productivity-focused > offerings cannot be incorporated into the sonoffconsulting.mobi domain -- > even if the present Page Limits were not already a major factor. QUESTION: > Why are only numeric keys supported when mobile device-based productivity > through the use of SmartPhones, PDAs, EDAs, etc. would be an obvious move up > from the basic mobile (cell) phone? > 3. I may not be correct on the way that I stated this third request, but it > appears from what I understand or interpret as the status of MWBP Testing > results that external-to-the-.mobi-Web-site-domain pages are expected to be > mobileOK-focused as well, are checked by W3C's MobileOK Best Practices > Checker software, and failure, of course. If this is a correct > interpretation, then I feel that this restriction from allowing hyperlinks > to other Web site's should be removed or in some way modified. The best > example I can give for where this situation seems not to be a reasonable one > is that hyperlinks to sonoffconsulting.com-based Web pages are not > considered acceptable yet they pass the above-stated conditions that reflect > a superset of the mobileOK Basic tests. > > QUESTION: Could someone within the W3C community please run with this set of > requests and advise all interested parties as to the merits or reasons for > rejecting one or more of the above requests? > > Thank you for your time and attention to this request. > > Raymond > > Raymond Sonoff, President > Sonoff Consulting Services, Inc. > 271 Saxony Drive > Crestview Hills, KY 41017 > Bus. Tel. No.: 859.261.5908 > Mobile Phone: 859.630.9568 > > Scsi P&KT Web site URL: http://sonoffconsulting.com/ > Gen'l e-mail: info@sonoffconsulting.com > Corp. e-mail scsi001@sonoffconsulting.com > > Scsi P&KT Mobile Web Site URL: http://sonoffconsulting.mobi/ > Mobile-mail: info@sonoffconsulting.mobi > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 15:25:57 UTC