- From: Andrea Trasatti <andrea@trasatti.it>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:19:11 +0100
- To: public-ddwg@w3.org
Il giorno 02/mar/07, alle ore 10:07, Rhys Lewis ha scritto: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to bring the discussion back to the specific topic of > the definition of the term 'device description'. > > After a lot of very useful discussion, I'm minded to: > > 1) suggest that we use the text I originally proposed along the > lines of: > > > Device Description: > > - That specific part of the delivery context directly related to > the hardware and software of the device. I'm jumping in late, even later than Jo, who apparently regained the lost time very quickly. I have read all the posts of course and have my opinion. I don't understand why we are restricting the "device description" definition to the delivery context. It should be a more general description that may cover ANY aspect of the device and that in our specific case is limited to the delivery context. I think that the definitions that actually matched my idea of DD are the earlier ones. This is my definition of device description: a collection of attribute-value pairs that detail the features and capabilities of a device In my understanding when the term "set" was used it was meant as a collection while it was later interpreted as a "collection of devices matching a set of parameters". This means that we went from something that is supposed to describe all the details of a single device to a "filter" that will return a list of devices. I would like to first define what a single description is and then we can talk about how you can group descriptions. - Andrea
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 21:19:25 UTC