- From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:38:26 +0100
- To: "Anders Ekstrand" <Anders.Ekstrand@drutt.com>, "Matt Womer" <mdw@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ddwg@w3.org>
The analogy of a "file handle" was fairly close to what we believed the context key could be. We don't insist that file handles are integers (though they often are implemented this way). We merely say that they are of a FileHandle type and can be used to interact with files once the files have been located by some other means (e.g. the file path and name). ---Rotan. -----Original Message----- From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anders Ekstrand Sent: 27 August 2007 20:26 To: Matt Womer Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org Subject: RE: ACTION-58 Look into issues surrounding the use of the 'any' type in the IDL Hi Matt, > I think of the Context Key IS the opaque handle itself. It is a > handle to the "Context", which is an implementation specific > structure in and of itself. I think that your view above is what we agreed on within the task force. You get the handle after searching by Brand + Model, User Agent String, certain characteristics or whatever we might come up with in the future. The handle in then only meaningful within this specific instance of a device repository, and cannot be used to "grab" a device profile in another instance. That how far we came, as I remember it. Best Regards - Anders
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 20:38:40 UTC