- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:08:48 +0100
- To: <public-ddwg@w3.org>
Hi Good work! It's not clear to me how this works, as we are of course working in public, but one point of process is that I think this is an Editors' Draft not a W3C Working Draft - i.e. the group has not taken a resolution to publish it as a WD. There also seems to be a problem with the XSLT as it is generating invalid HTML for the bibliographic references. [as a general point of principle the references should only include documents that are actually referred to from the text so the list will probably need pruning.] I've edited the doc to be an editors' draft, corrected the HTML on the references and also tidied up the directory structure so that /latest always points to the most recent update. And each version has a separate identity, i.e. the current version is: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/070806.html or http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/latest Jo PS Jose if you want to put the xmlspec version up in the drafts directory I will try to figure out why it is not working properly - I have various XSLTs that I have used before so may be quick to fix. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of José Manuel Cantera Fonseca > Sent: 06 August 2007 11:39 > To: public-ddwg@w3.org > Subject: [API] First internal draft of the API document > > > Hi all, > > We have a first internal draft of the API document that contains an > initial-proposed 'table of contents' [1]. > > Best Regards > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 20:09:14 UTC