- From: Rotan Hanrahan <Rotan.Hanrahan@MobileAware.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:51:59 +0100
- To: "Lior Sion" <LiorS@flashnetworks.com>, <public-ddwg@w3.org>
There are two Requirements identified in the document: [DDR-QRY-EXACT] It SHOULD be possible for an Actor to query the DDR specifying an exact match required in response to the query [DDR-QRY-BEST-EFFORT] It SHOULD be possible for an Actor to query the DDR specifying a best-effort match required in response to the query. In the case of an exact match query, a failure to match would be reported as a "miss", as you call it. In the case of a best-effort match query, the response would be the nearest matching device. There are a number of implementation possibilities regarding the representation of approximation. The specific interpretation of "closest" would be something we would consider in the implementation workshop. If more than one interpretation is necessary, a means for the Actor to indicate the required interpretation would be necessary. I do not wish to go into the specifics of implementations at this point. Instead I wish just to confirm that the issue you have mentioned is one that the group is aware of, and wishes to consider as part of future implementation strategies. Regarding the device/browser distinction, we acknowledge that information about both may be necessary to achieve proper content adaptation. We would only expect a device to be identified if the client (browser) specfically indicates the device in which it is executing, or if the delivery environment has some alternative means of detecting the hardware during the interaction between client and server. The specifics of the recognition process are out of scope for the DDR, which merely assumes that a means of uniquely identifying the client/device exists, and that the representation of the unique identity can be conveyed to the DDR in queries. Regards, ---Rotan. ________________________________ From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lior Sion Sent: 04 May 2006 13:38 To: public-ddwg@w3.org Subject: Comments on Device Description Repository Requirements 1.0 Hi, I have a questions about v1.0 of the req: (a) 2.1.1, especially flow 2.1.7: what is the expected result of a "miss" on the repository? Would the answer be "device not found" or will the repository look for the closest know device? Will it mark the answer as "closest"? How will this closest be found? I think that in today's market, and also in the foreseen future, this is one of the main issues. Device identification changes, sometimes slightly - different devices come with identical browsers - what would count as a "hit"? The correct browsers version or the device version? Thanks, Lior Sion ************************************************************************ ************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************ ************
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 12:52:16 UTC